Gastelum

Gastelum v. Pinnacle Hotel Circle LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20223:21-cv-01458California3,284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21-CV-1458 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; (2) DENYING AS MOOT PINNACLE HOTEL CIRCLE LP, dba

DEFENDANT’S EVIDENTIARY

Comfort Inn and Suites San Diego Zoo OBJECTIONS; AND (3) GRANTING SeaWorld Area,

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

16 Defendant. DISMISS 17 (ECF Nos. 3, 3-4, 8) 18 19 Presently before the Court are Defendant Pinnacle Hotel Circle LP’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (“Mot.,” ECF No. 3) and Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN,” ECF No. 3-4). Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 6) and the Declaration of Fernando Gastelum (“Gastelum Decl.,” ECF No. 6 at 9–16), and Defendant filed a Reply in Support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 7) and Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff’s Declaration (“Objs.,” ECF No. 8). The Court took the matter under submission without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.