Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No.: 20cv1818-MMA (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART JOINT MOTION

AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

CISSY STEELE. et al., [ECF NO. 112] Defendants. 16 17 On May 20, 2022, the parties filed a “Joint Motion Requesting Amended Scheduling Order.” (ECF No. 112.) In support, the parties explain that at a telephonic Case Management Conference on April 21, 2022, they expressed a shared interest in holding a settlement conference and continuing the fact discovery deadline. (Id. at 2.) Thereafter, based on the parties’ agreement and joint request, the Court set a settlement conference on June 10, 2022, and continued the fact discovery cutoff to August 5, 2022. (ECF No. 111.) The parties now “request . . . to continue specific dates set forth in the First Amended Scheduling Order” concerning expert discovery and the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF No. 112 at 2.)…