Allen

Allen v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20223:20-cv-01389California1,864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 MICHAEL ALLEN, Case No.: 20cv1389-JLS-MDD 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CONFIDENTIAL ADDRESS, AND

DR. THERESA CURRIER,

(2) DIRECTING SERVICE OF Defendant. PROCESS 16 [ECF No. 45] 18 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michael Allen, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 20, 2020. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Dr. Currier-Du violated his Eighth Amendment rights when she was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. See SAC (ECF No. 35 at 3, 9-16). He also alleges Dr. Currier-Du violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for complaining about his medical treatment. (Id. at 4, 16-19). On November 6, 2020, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP and permitting 45…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.