Simon

Simon v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20223:21-cv-01488California5,834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES SIMON, individually and Case No.: 3:21-cv-1488-LL-MSB behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS v. 14 [ECF No. 16]

SEAWORLD PARKS &

15 ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant SeaWorld’s (“SeaWorld”) Motion to Dismiss the First, Second, Third, Fifth, and Sixth causes of action in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 16. The Motion has been fully briefed and is suitable for submission without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Charles Simon filed this putative consumer class action complaint on August 20, 2021. ECF No. 1. The operative SAC was filed on September 28, 2021. ECF No. 15. The SAC asserts the following claims: (1) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.