Nosirrah Management, LLC v. Franklin Wireless Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOSIRRAH MANAGEMENT, LLC, Case No.: 21-cv-01316-JO-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER
FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP.; O.C.
KIM,
[ECF No. 35] Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff seeks an order “forbidding inquiry into Topic Nos. 4–10” of Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice. (ECF No. 35-1 at 1.) For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. /// /// 24 25 Plaintiff includes as Exhibit A its responses to all 18 of Defendants’ 30(b)(6) 26 deposition topics. (See ECF No. 35-3.) However, Plaintiff only disputes Topic Nos. 4–10. (ECF No. 35-1 at 1.) As represented in an informal Discovery Conference with the Court on May 12, 2022, Plaintiff has agreed to produce a witness for Topic Nos. 1–3 and 11–18. 28 …