Dalfio

Dalfio v. Barlas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20223:21-cv-01699California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DALFIO, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1699-L-AHG

Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER ON CONVERTED MOTION

12 BARLAS, et al., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Defendants. 3) 14 Pending before the Court in this ADA action is a converted motion for summary judgment. (ECF 3). Plaintiff opposed, and Defendants replied. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motion. Background Plaintiff Victor Dalfio “has had two hip replacements. He also dislocated his hip. He has difficulty walking and standing. Plaintiff uses a cane most of the time and uses a walker as needed.” (ECF 1, Complaint (“Compl.”) at ¶ 1). Plaintiff alleges he is a disabled person as defined under federal and state law. Id. Plaintiff has been issued a permanent disabled person parking placard. Id. Defendants own the property at 1501 Rosecrans Street, San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.