Montero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KARINA MONTERO, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01431-L-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART JOINT

v.

MOTION TO CONTINUE FACT

HYATT CORPORATION, doing DISCOVERY DEADLINE business as ANDAZ SAN DIEGO, 16 [ECF No. 19] Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Fact Discovery Deadline. ECF No. 19. The parties seek to continue the fact discovery cutoff by approximately 90 days. Id. Parties seeking to modify the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 16 at ¶ 20 (operative scheduling order, stating that “[t]he dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard…