Scally
Scally v. Flores
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20223:22-cv-00182California1,185 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONY EUGENE SCALLY, Case No.: 22cv0182-DMS (MDD)
CDCR #G-67776,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
A. FLORES and E. VEGA,
(2) DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS
AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
Defendants. EXCEPT FLORES AND VEGA
18 (3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT SERVICE OF FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
SUMMONS ON FLORES AND VEGA
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) & Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 22 23 Plaintiff Tony Eugene Scally is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 7.) On May 12, 2022, the Court screened the FAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b), which require the Court to sua sponte dismiss a prisoner’s in forma pauperis complaint, or any portion of it, which is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks 1 …