Fleischman

Fleischman v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20223:22-cv-00699California730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SABRINA FLEISCHMAN, Case No.: 22-CV-699-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16

18 Plaintiff files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint (“IFP Motion”). (Doc. No. 2.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under U.S.C. section 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court finds the Complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief. Thus, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. section 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.