Castro

Castro v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20223:22-cv-00802California1,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIC RAY CASTRO; Case No.: 22-cv-802-CAB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., [Doc. No. 2]; and Defendants. 2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

17 On June 2, 2022, Plaintiff Eric Ray Castro, a non-prisoner, filed this civil action 18 against a host of defendants, including the State of California, California Highway Patrol, 19 and San Bernardino County, among others. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff did not prepay the civil 20 filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, he filed a Motion 21 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2.]

I. Motion to Proceed IFP

23 Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in this court must pay a filing fee. See 24 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5(a). However, under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.