Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. v. Project Management Institute, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20223:18-cv-01927California6,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES Case No.: 18cv1927 JO (MSB)

RESEARCH, INC.,

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL

Plaintiff, 12 v.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE,

INC.,

15 Defendant.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE,

INC., Counter-Claimant, v. WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES

RESEARCH, INC.,

21 Counter-Defendant. 22 23 Plaintiff Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. (“WTRI”) and Defendant Project Management Institute, Inc. (“PMI”)’s filed a Joint Motion to Seal in connection with the Parties’ Motions in Limine and Daubert Motions. (Doc. No. 328). For the reasons set forth below, the Parties’ Joint Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN- PART. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.