Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. The Crosby Estate at Rancho Santa Fe Master Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20223:21-cv-01249California562 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRONSHORE SPECIALTY Case No.: 21-cv-1249-WQH-AHG

INSURANCE COMPANY,

12

ORDER

Plaintiff, 13 v. 14

THE CROSBY ESTATE AT RANCHO

15

SANTA FE MASTER ASSOCIATION,

16 Defendant. 17

18

THE CROSBY ESTATE AT RANCHO

19 SANTA FE MASTER ASSOCIATION, 20 Counter Claimant, 21 v. 22 IRONSHORE SPECIALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY,

23 Counter Defendant. 24 25 HAYES, Judge: 26 The matter before the Court is the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 27 28) filed by Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company. 28 1 On July 9, 2021, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company (“Ironshore”) filed a 2 Complaint against The Crosby Estate at Rancho Santa Fe Master Association (“The 3 Crosby”), concerning Ironshore’s obligations under an insurance policy (the “Policy”) 4 issued by Ironshore to The Crosby. (ECF No. 1). Ironshore brought a claim under the 5 Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202, requesting (1) “[a] judgment 6 declaring that The Crosby must satisfy the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.