Hearn

Hearn v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20223:22-cv-00255California4,755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLIAM HEARN, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00255-TWR-AGS

CDCR# AS-7111,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS; (2) SCREENING

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

RJD WARDEN, E. FRIJAS, M.

U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A. POLLARD, JOHN DOE 1 to 8,

Defendants. (ECF No. 2) 16 17 William Hearn (“Plaintiff” or “Hearn”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), and proceeding pro se, has filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (The “Compl.,” see ECF No. 1.) Hearn has not paid the $402 civil filing fee; instead, he has filed a Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (See ECF Nos. 2, 4.) Hearn alleges his First and Eighth Amendment rights were violated by Defendants. (See generally Compl.) I. Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis All parties instituting any civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.