Rohrer

Gonzales v. Rohrer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20223:21-cv-00389California971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN ANTOINETTE GONZALES, Case No.: 21-CV-389 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER

JURISDICTION

GWEN GLEASON ROHRER and

DEELA BURNS,

(ECF Nos. 14–15) Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Susan Antoinette Gonzales’s Response to Order to Show Cause (“Response,” ECF No. 15). On May 13, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See ECF No. 14 (the “OSC”). Specifically, the Court noted that there does not appear to be federal-question jurisdiction given that Plaintiff asserts no claims that facially arise under federal law; that there does not appear to be diversity jurisdiction given that Plaintiff indicates all Parties are residents of San Diego, California; and that there does not appear to be jurisdiction based on the presence of the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.