Aguillon

Aguillon v. Moskowitz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20223:22-cv-00453California1,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22-CV-453 TWR (JLB)

ERNESTO AGUILLON, ORDER (1) GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, 14 v. AND (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, COMPLAINT

Defendant. (ECF No. 2)

18 19 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Ernesto Aguillon’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2 (“IFP Mot.”).) For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and sua sponte DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. (“Compl.”)) following the screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff requests leave to proceed IFP because he claims he is “unable to pay the costs of the proceedings.” (IFP Mot. at 1.) All…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.