Stroud

Stroud v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20223:18-cv-00515-JLS-MDDCalifornia2,567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLARD RICHARD STROUD, JR., Case No.: 18-CV-515 JLS (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

13 (ECF No. 108) SHERIFF WILLIAM D. GORE, et al., Defendants. 16

Presently before the Court is Defendants Sergeant Paul Michalke, Detective Benjamin Shea, and Sergeant Jesus Lizarraga’s (collectively, the “Deputy Defendants”) Motion for Reconsideration (“Mot.,” ECF No. 108). Plaintiff Willard Stroud, appearing pro se, did not file an opposition to the instant Motion. The Court vacated the hearing and took the Motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 108. Having considered the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court DENIES the Deputy Defendants’ Motion. BACKGROUND The Parties and this Court are intimately familiar with the facts of this long-enduring matter, and accordingly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.