Talavera Hair Products, Inc. v. Taizhou Yunsung Electrical Appliance Co., LTD.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20223:18-cv-00823California7,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TALAVERA HAIR PRODUCTS, INC., Case No.: 18-cv-00823-RBM-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR MONTETARY AND

TAIZHOU YUNSUNG ELECTRICAL

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST

APPLIANCE CO., LTD. et al., DEFAULTED DEFENDANTS Defendants. 16 [Doc. 125] 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Talavera Hair Products, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for monetary and injunctive relief against the Defaulted Defendants1 (“Motion”). 20 21 1 The “Defaulted Defendants” are those against whom Plaintiff secured an entry of default 22 on February 21, 2019, minus those who have since been dismissed, namely: allforyoushopper.usa (3), ANIMON (4), anothercloud (5), Aosend (6), AoStyle (7), AuPolus (8), Beisirui Hair Store (11), Cai ming zhil (12), Ciao Fashion (14), Enjoy&Life 24 (19), Fosen Man (20), Georgy’s Store (22), Hairsmile (24), Judi Shop (26), Kosmasl (27), Lanmpu Creative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.