Izenberg

Izenberg v. Integon National Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20223:22-cv-00879California993 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ROBERT IZENBERG and CINDY Case No.: 22-CV-879-CAB-AGS

LOEB,

ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING

Plaintiffs, CASE TO STATE COURT v.

INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

13 Defendant. 14 15 On May 9, 2022, Plaintiffs Robert Izenberg and Cindy Loeb filed the original complaint in this matter in San Diego Superior Court. [Doc. No. 1-3.] Plaintiffs’ complaint does not seek any damages and prays only for reformation of an insurance policy to include personal umbrella liability coverage with a limit of $1,000,000. [Id.] On June 16, 2022, Defendant Integon National Insurance Company (“Integon”) removed the action to this Court, asserting original jurisdiction over the matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. [Doc. No. 1.] After reviewing the notice of removal and complaint, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to state court. A suit filed in state court may be removed to federal court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.