Ignacio Canela v. W. L. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20223:19-cv-01434-GPC-MSBCalifornia6,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IGNACIO CANELA, Case No.: 19cv1434-GPC (MSB)

Petitioner,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE:

v. MOTION FOR STAY [ECF NO. 57] KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, Respondent. 16 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 636(b) and Civil Local Rules 72.1(d) and HC.2 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on July 10, 2019, raising the single, exhausted claim that the trial court violated his federal constitutional rights when it revoked his right to self-representation just prior to the start of trial. (ECF No. 1 at 2, 6-8.) Respondent answered on October 10, 2019. (ECF No. 13.) Petitioner requested thirteen extensions of the deadline to file his traverse, which the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.