California Coastal Commission v. North County Transit District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, Case No.: 22cv00587-LL-BGS 11 a California public agency, Related Case: 22cv00503-LL-BGS 12 Petitioner/Plaintiff,
ORDER:
13 v. (1) TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT,
CONSOLIDATION;
a California public agency; Does 1 through
25, (2) STAYING CASE SUA SPONTE;
Respondents/Defendants, (3) GRANTING-IN-PART JOINT
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
EXBON DEVELOPMENT, INC., a TO RESPOND TO California corporation; and DOES 26 COMPLAINT; and through 50, inclusive,
Real Parties in Interest/ (4) DENYING JOINT MOTION TO Defendants STAY RULING ON MOTION
TO STAY
22 [ECF No. 6]
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) neither authorize nor prohibit the use of fictitious parties; however, FRCP 10 does require a plaintiff to include the names of 25 all parties in his complaint. Rojas v. Sea World Parks & Ent., Inc., 538 F. Supp. 3d 1008, 1030-31 (S.D. Cal.…