Doe
Doe v. San Diego Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, et al., Case No.: 21cv1809-LL-MDD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al., [ECF No. 35] Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. ECF No. 35. Plaintiffs seek to prevent Defendants, including the San Diego Unified School District (“SDUSD”), from enforcing their COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Id. The Motion has been fully briefed and is suitable for submission without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED. / / / 25 26 1 The Plaintiffs as set forth in the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) are three sets of parents and four students: John and Jane Doe and their child Jill Doe, Tiffany Roe and her children Terry and Taylor Roe, 28 I. BACKGROUND A. SDUSD’s Vaccination Roadmap and Related Procedural History …