Beeman

Beeman v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20223:21-cv-00457California2,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANE BEEMAN, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00457-RBM-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION

v. FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; (2)

GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

TO FILE ANSWER; AND (3)

Defendants. DENYING MOTION FOR ENTRY

OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

[Docs. 37, 39, 41] 18 On May 4, 2022, Plaintiff Shane Beeman (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant San Diego Police Department (the “Department”). (Doc. 37.) On May 23, 2022, Defendants City of San Diego, Dave Gibson, and San Diego Police Department (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. (Doc. 40.) At the same time, the Department filed a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(b) for leave to file an answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (Doc. 39.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.