Fisher

Fisher v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20223:22-cv-00339California2,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SCHELLY FISHER, Case No.: 22-cv-339-W-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. MOTION TO REMAND [DOC. 4]

AND (2) TERMINATING

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 3]

AS MOOT Defendant. 18 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Schelly Fisher’s motion to remand this case to the San Diego Superior Court. Defendant opposes. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand [Doc. 4] and ORDERS the case remanded. In light of this order, Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss [Doc. 3] is TERMINATED as moot. // // // I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This case arises from Plaintiff Schelly Fisher’s purchase of a 2017 Ford Edge (the “Vehicle”) from El Cajon Ford. (Compl. ¶ 4.1) The Complaint alleges that during the warranty period, the vehicle began…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.