Tuck
Tuck v. Graves
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROY TUCK, Case No.: 21cv2086-JO-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL
JONATHON GRAVES; SAMUEL
TO EFFECT SERVICE OF
ROBISON; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO;
COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS and DOES 1 through 20, 16 Defendants. 17 18
20 Plaintiff Roy Tuck (“Plaintiff”), a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint against Defendants Jonathon Graves, Samuel Robison, the County of San Diego, and Does 1 through 20 (collectively, “Defendants”). Dkt. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). Plaintiff filed a concurrent motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the IFP motion is GRANTED. I. Motion to Proceed IFP Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee and instead requested to proceed IFP, claiming an inability to pay. A plaintiff instituting any civil action,…