Doe

Doe v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20223:22-cv-00010California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JANE DOE, et al. CASE NO. 22-cv-10-LAB (DEB)

Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING vs. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

ROB BONTA, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of 15 California, et al. Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs Jane Doe and John Doe Nos. 1 through 4 filed this action against Defendant Rob Bonta, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, asking the Court to enjoin Defendant from enforcing California Assembly Bill 173. Plaintiffs contend, as relevant to this Order, that AB 173 infringes upon their right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, and Plaintiffs have filed a motion for preliminary injunction (the “Motions”). Both Motions are currently pending and ask the Court to apply District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), and Ninth Circuit precedent “employ[ing] a two-prong test to the challenged law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.