Hamilton

Hamilton v. Moseley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20223:21-cv-02032California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANNY HAMILTON, Case No.: 21cv2032-CAB-AHB

CC22MX910/CDCR #T61263,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [Doc. vs. No. 35]

15 KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary of the 16 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., Defendants. 19 Danny Hamilton (Plaintiff) is a state inmate currently incarcerated at the Contra Costa County West County Detention Facility. He is proceeding pro se, and has filed a civil rights Complaint (and First Amended Complaint) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF Nos. 1 and 8). On June 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Appointment of Counsel.” (ECF No. 35.) I. Motion to Appoint Counsel Plaintiff asks the Court to appoint counsel for him because he is indigent, incarcerated, and “unlearned in the law.” (ECF No. 35 at 1-2.) However, there is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case. Lassiter v. Dept. of Social Servs,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.