Perez

Perez v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20223:20-cv-02501California2,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CARLOS PEREZ, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02501-LL-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND J. JALOMO, et al., DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL, and Defendants.

(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

ORAL MOTION TO EXTEND

DISCOVERY DEADLINES

19 [ECF No. 34] 20 21 22 23 Before the Court is Defendant J. Jalomo’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Compel. ECF No. 34. Defendant seeks an order from the Court compelling Plaintiff Carlos Perez (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se, to provide responses to various interrogatories and requests for production. Id. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to compel. I. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2022, Defendant alerted the Court that the parties had a discovery dispute. Email to Chambers (Feb. 9, 2022, at 9:40 AM). Specifically, Defendant noted that he had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.