Appel

Appel v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20223:18-cv-00814California12,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD APPEL, Case No.: 18-cv-814-L-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF

TO RESPOND TO DEPOSITION

ROBERT S. WOLF,

QUESTIONS

Defendant. [ECF 80] 17 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Robert S. Wolf has filed a Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Respond to Deposition Questions and Plaintiff Howard Appel has filed an Opposition. (ECF 80, 83.1) The parties’ Joint Statement indexing the relevant portions of the transcript of Plaintiff’s deposition is also before the Court. (ECF 77.) 23 24 25 1 At the request of the parties, the briefing schedule included the filing of an index of the 26 portions of the transcript the parties would both rely on in their briefing. (ECF 77.) The Court did not require the parties to directly quote every question from the transcript in their briefs because they were providing the index, however, the Court did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.