Vertical Bridge Development, LLC v. Brawley City Council

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20223:21-cv-02153California2,930 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERTICAL BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT, Case No.: 21-cv-02153 AJB AHG

LLC,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO STRIKE

BRAWLEY CITY COUNCIL and THE (Doc. No. 8) CITY of BRAWLEY, CALIFORNIA, and 16 DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Defendants. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Vertical Bridge Development, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to strike Defendants Brawley City Council and The City of Brawley, California’s (collectively, “Defendants”) affirmative defenses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). (Doc. No. 8.) Defendants filed an opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. (Doc. Nos. 10, 11.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff constructs, operates, and manages telecommunication infrastructure across the United States. (Doc. No. 1 ¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.