Witt
Witt v. Bristol Farms
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALIMA WITT, Case No. 21-cv-00411-BAS-AGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 29) BRISTOL FARMS,
Defendant. 16 The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff Salima Witt’s Complaint for failure to state a claim but granted her leave to amend “out of an abundance of caution.” (Mar. 11, 2022 Order, ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff has since filed an Amended Complaint. (Am. Compl., ECF No. 28.) Defendant Bristol Farms moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot., ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff opposed the motion (Opp’n, ECF No. 30), and Defendant replied (Reply, ECF No. 31). The Court finds Defendant’s motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). For the reasons 25 26 1 Defendant also renews its request for…