United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Just Construction, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20223:19-cv-01753California251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR Case No.: 19cv1753 JM (KSC)

THE USE AND BENEFIT OF JUST

CONSTRUCTION, INC., ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION Plaintiff,

14 v. 15 K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., 16 Defendant.

18 Presently before the court is the Parties’ “Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action.” (Doc. No. 140). The stipulation is signed by all Parties who have appeared in this action. Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by: (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). The Parties’ stipulation of dismissal satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and is, therefore, effective on filing. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action, in its 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.