Becerra
Becerra v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEFANIE BECERRA, Case No. 22-cv-00202-BAS-MSB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL
v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 5.)
ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK
INDEMNITY COMPANY,
15 Defendant.
Before the Court is Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company (“Allstate”)’s motion to dismiss Count of Plaintiff Stefanie Becerra (“Becerra”)’s Complaint (Compl., Ex. A to Not. of Removal, ECF No. 1-2). (Mot., ECF No. 5; Mem., ECF No. 5-1.) Specifically, Allstate moves to dismiss Becerra’s breach of contract claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (See Mot. at 1.) Becerra opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 6) and Allstate replies (Reply, ECF No. 7). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons explained below, Allstate’s Motion is GRANTED.