Castro
Castro v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIC RAY CASTRO; Case No.: 22-cv-802-CAB-MSB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 15 On June 7, 2022, this Court issued an order granting Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). [Doc. No. 4.] The Court instructed Plaintiff that he could file an amended complaint remedying the defects in his complaint as described in the June 7 order. [Id.] On June 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. [Doc. No. 5.] Upon review, Plaintiffs’ amended complaint fails to resolve the issues highlighted in the Court’s June 7 order. Plaintiff lists five government agency defendants and cites to various sections of the United States Code that he alleges each defendant is “charged for/with.” However, the…