Rose

Rose v. Niccole

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20223:22-cv-00158California2,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BEVERLY ROSE; Case No.: 22cv158-LL-WVG

JACK G. ROSE,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, FILE SUR-REPLY [ECF No. 12]; v.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

MICHAEL NICCOLE, M.D.;

REMAND TO STATE COURT [ECF

MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC,

No. 7]; 16 Defendants. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION MOTIONS TO

DISMISS [ECF Nos. 3, 5]

21 Before the Court is Beverly Rose and Jack G. Rose (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand (“Motion”). ECF No. 7. Plaintiffs filed the Motion on March 3, 2022, and Mentor Worldwide LLC (“Defendant” or “Mentor”) filed an Opposition to the Motion on March 17, 2022. ECF No. 10. Plaintiffs filed a Reply on March 24, 2022. ECF No. 11. On March 25, 2022, Defendant Mentor filed an Ex Parte Application for Leave to File a Sur-Reply. ECF No. 12. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.