Rhinehart

Rhinehart v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20223:22-cv-00678California2,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JOSEPH RHINEHART, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00678-LAB-MDD

CDCR #C-39412,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[Dkt. 2]; AND W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden;

J. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer; 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

ARVIZU, Correctional Officer, EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT Defendants. AND SUMMONS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) 20 21 Plaintiff Michael Joseph Rhinehart, an inmate currently incarcerated at Calipatria State Prison (“CAL”), and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. / / / / / / I. Motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.