Petersen
Petersen v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEAGAN PETERSEN, an individual, Case No.: 3:22-CV-668-RSH-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT FCA US, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 15 20, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 On June 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion For Leave To Amend (“Motion”). ECF No. 11. The Motion seeks to add a third cause of action for violation of the Magnuson- Moss Warranty Act. Defendant does not oppose the amendment. ECF No. 11 at 2. The district court should “freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The court considers five factors in determining whether a motion for leave to amend is appropriate: “bad faith, undue delay, prejudice to the opposing party, futility of amendment, and whether the plaintiff has previously amended the complaint.” Johnson v. Buckley, 356 F.3d 1067, 1077 (9th Cir. 2004). Here, and as explained in the Motion (ECF No. 11 at 3-5),…