Carlsberg

Carlsberg v. Wilken

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20223:21-cv-01746California2,671 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 DEANNA CARLSBERG, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01746-H-RBB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary, U.S. [Doc. No. 30.] Department of Veterans Affairs, 18 Defendant. 19 20 On March 17, 2021, Plaintiff Deanna Carlsberg filed a first amended complaint 21 against Defendant Denis McDonough. (Doc. No. 15.) On December 27, 2021, Defendant 22 filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 30.) The Court 23 granted Plaintiff two extensions of time to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion to 24 dismiss. (Doc. Nos. 31, 34.) On February 4, 2022, Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. No. 32.) 25 On March 4, 2022, the Court submitted Defendant’s motion on the parties’ papers 26 pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and vacated the hearing. (Doc. No. 35.) Plaintiff has yet 27 to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants 28 Defendant’s motion to dismiss without prejudice. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.