Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
l 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN RE QUALCOMM CASE NO. 17cv121 JO-MSB
INCORPORATED SECURITIES
11 |} LITIGATION ORDER DENYING REQUEST
D FOR SUR-REPLY
13 14 15 Defendants Qualcomm Incorporated, Derek A. Aberle, Steven R. Altman, Willian ||F. Davidson, Paul E. Jacobs, Steven M. Mollenkopf, and Donald J. Rosenbers ||(collectively, “Defendants”) have requested to file a sur-reply in opposition to any ||arguments Lead Plaintiffs may raise on the issue of price impact in their reply in suppor of their motion for class certification. Dkt. 229. Defendants have also requested to move hearing date from September 14, 2022, to the next available date after September 21 2022. For the reasons described below, Defendants’ request to file a sur-reply is deniec 24 || without prejudice. Permitting the filing ofa sur-reply is within the discretion of the distric ||court. Nat’l Cas. Co. v. Nat’l Strength &…