McFalls

McFalls v. Alonzo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20223:21-cv-00849California1,091 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT NELSON MCFALLS, Case No. 21-cv-849-MMA (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE EXTENDING

v. TIME TO SERVE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING U.S.

MARIO ALONZO,

MARSHAL TO AFFECT SERVICE

Defendant. 16 17 On September 24, 2021, Plaintiff Robert Nelson McFalls, a California state inmate proceeding pro se, filed a first amended civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Mario Alonzo, a Lieutenant at Centinela State Prison. See Doc. No. 8 (“FAC”). On November 3, 2021, Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim survived screening, see Doc. No. 9, and a summons was issued, see Doc. No. 10. The Court directed the U.S. Marshal to serve Defendant as directed by Plaintiff on U.S. Marshal Form 285. Doc. No. 9 at 7. On December 28, 2021, Plaintiff’s Form 285 was entered onto the Docket. See Doc. No. 11. According to the Form, the U.S. Marshal mailed the summons and First 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.