Simpson

Simpson v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20223:21-cv-01763California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTE JAMAL SIMPSON, Case No.: 21cv1763-CAB-NLS

Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 14]

AND GRANTING MOTION FOR

MOORE, STAY AND ABEYANCE [Doc. No. 5] Respondent. 16 On October 12, 2021, Petitioner Dionte Jamal Simpson (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, [Doc. No. 1.] On January 24, 2022, Petitioner filed a Motion for Stay and Abeyance. [Doc. No. 5.] On June 28, 2022, Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that the Court grant the motion for stay and abeyance pursuant to King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133, 1141-42 (9th Cir. 2009)(“King”). [Doc. No. 14.] The Report also ordered that any objections were to be filed by July 5, 2022. [Report at 3.] To date, no objection has been filed, nor has there been a request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.