De La Rosa v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20223:21-cv-01630California1,954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTHA DE LA ROSA, Case No.: 21-cv-1630-W-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART JOINT

MOTION TO AMEND

COSTCO WHOLESALE

SCHEDULING ORDER

CORPORATION

15 Defendant. [ECF 15] 17 On July 5, 2022, the parties filed a Joint Motion seeking to extend almost1 every deadline set in the Court’s November 19, 2021 Scheduling Order by 150 days, including five deadlines that have already passed. (ECF 15.) For the reasons set forth below, the Joint Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Joint Motion The parties’ Joint Motion seeks to extend five deadlines in the Scheduling Order that have already passed, beginning with the March 8, 2022 deadline to complete fact discovery through the June 6, 2022 deadline to supplement disclosures under Rule 26 27 1 The parties did not seek to extend the December 8, 2021 deadline to amend the 28 26(a)(2)(D) and 26(e). (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.