Mayfield
Mayfield v. Aerotek, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMEEKA MAYFIELD, an individual, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01947-JAH-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S AEROTEK, INC., a Maryland MOTION TO REMAND, [ECF No. 6]; Corporation; KIT NELSON, an 15 individual; and DOES 1 through 10, (2) REMANDING ACTION TO THE inclusive,
SUPERIOR COURT OF
Defendants. CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO;
(3) DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
20 STRIKE, [ECF No. 4]. 21 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Timeeka Mayfield’s (“Plaintiff”) timely filed Motion to Remand to State Court, (“Mot. to Remand”, ECF No. 6). Defendants Aerotek, Inc. (“Aerotek”) and Christopher Nelson (“Mr. Nelson”)1 (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion to Remand, (“Opp’n to Mtn. to Remand”, 26 27 1 Christopher Nelson and “Kit Nelson” refer to the same individual, who hereinafter will 28 ECF No. 8), and Plaintiff replied, (“Reply to Mtn. to Remand”, ECF No.…