Williams v. United States Marshals

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20223:22-cv-00139California2,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY PAUL WILLIAMS, Case No.: 22-cv-0139-BAS-BLM #61027298,

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR vs. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND § 1915A(b)

U.S. MARSHAL DOE #1, U.S.

MARSHAL DOE #2,

Defendants. 18 On January 31, 2022, Plaintiff Billy Paul Williams, a federal detainee being held at Otay Mesa Detention Center California,1 and proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (See Compl., ECF No. 1 at 1.) On February 2, 2022, the Court dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement under 28 U.S.C. 24 25 1 Plaintiff was arrested on July 31, 2021 and charged with importation of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. (See United States v. Williams,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.