McCormack

ERA Property Management v. McCormack

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20223:22-cv-00804California1,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ERA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Case No.: 22-CV-804 JLS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND (2) REMANDING FOR LACK

ALEXANDRA MCCORMACK, and

OF SUBJECT MATTER

DAIDEN B. AHERN, JURISDICTION Defendants. 15 (ECF No. 2)

17 18 Presently before the Court is Defendants Alexandra McCormack and Daiden B. Ahern’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed this unlawful detainer action from the Superior Court of California, County of Imperial, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (“Not. of Removal,” ECF No. at 1–3). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to § 1915(a) and REMANDS this action to the Superior Court of California, County of Imperial, for lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.