McCormack
ERA Property Management v. McCormack
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ERA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Case No.: 22-CV-804 JLS (MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND (2) REMANDING FOR LACK
ALEXANDRA MCCORMACK, and
OF SUBJECT MATTER
DAIDEN B. AHERN, JURISDICTION Defendants. 15 (ECF No. 2)
17 18 Presently before the Court is Defendants Alexandra McCormack and Daiden B. Ahern’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed this unlawful detainer action from the Superior Court of California, County of Imperial, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (“Not. of Removal,” ECF No. at 1–3). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to § 1915(a) and REMANDS this action to the Superior Court of California, County of Imperial, for lack…