Carroll

Carroll v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20223:19-cv-02126California7,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABONILICO LAMAR CARROLL, Case No.: 19cv2126-RBM (KSC)

CDCR #BK-9830

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS

JUDGMENT; AND

WRIGHT AND MILLER,

16 Defendants. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

18 [ECF Nos. 98, 112]

20 Plaintiff Abonilico Lamar Carroll is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a Second Amended Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 30.) He claims that while housed at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, Defendants RJD Correctional Officers Wright and Miller were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety when they denied his request for a lower tier cell assignment after he returned from surgery unable to walk, resulting in an injury from a fall down a flight of stairs. (Id. at 6-12.) Currently pending are cross-motions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.