Carr

Carr v. McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20223:21-cv-00900California4,933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL D. CARR, Case No.: 21cv900-MMA(MSB)

Petitioner,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR

v. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE

NEIL MCDOWELL, et al.,

PURSUANT TO RHINES

Respondents. 16 17 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Michael M. Anello pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 636(b) and Civil Local Rules 72.1(d) and HC.2 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On May 10, 2021, Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”). (ECF No. 1.) Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s “Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Stay and Abeyance” (“Motion to Stay”) and Respondents’ “Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Stay” (“Opposition”). (ECF Nos. 18, 20.) The Court has considered the Motion to Stay, the Opposition, and the whole record. For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.