Hearn

Hearn v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20223:22-cv-00255California1,756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HEARN, Case No. 3:22-cv-00255-TWR-AGS

CDCR #AR7111,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) DISMISSING EIGHTH

AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST

WARDEN, R.J. Donovan Correctional WARDEN, POLLARD, AND FRIJAS Facility, E. FRIJAS, Correctional

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

Counselor II; M. POLLARD, Reviewer §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND 1915A(b)(1) Authority; JOHN DOES 1‒8, Correctional 17 Officers.

AND

Defendants. 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

AND SUMMONS PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). 22 23 William Hearn (“Plaintiff” or “Hearn”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), and proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 24, 2022. (See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”).) Hearn did not pay the $402 civil filing fee; instead, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.