Piccini
Piccini v. City of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SHAYLA PICCINI, BRANDI Case No.: 21-CV-01343-W-KSC MATTHEWS, and JAYCIE
MATTHEWS, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff,
MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 14]
16 v. 17 CITY OF SAN DIEGO; and DOES 1- 25, inclusive; Defendant(s). 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ third and sixth causes of action and strike the request for attorney’s fees and a civil penalty. Plaintiffs oppose. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion [Doc. 14] with leave to amend. // // I. BACKGROUND This case arises from Plaintiffs’ attendance at a Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest on June 4, 2020. (Second Amend. Compl. (“SAC”) ¶ 11.) Plaintiffs Shayla Piccini, Brandi Matthews, and Jaycie Matthews are related and are “half-black.” …