Certified Nutraceuticals Inc. v. The Clorox Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20223:18-cv-00744California4,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 CERTIFIED NUTRACEUTICALS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-744-W-KSC INC., a California corporation,

ORDER GRANTING

Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 16 168] THE CLOROX COMPANY, et al., 17 18 Defendants.

20 Pending before the Court is Defendants The Clorox Company, Nutranext, and Neocell Holding Company’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment. (Mot. [Doc. 168].) Plaintiff Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc. opposes and requests that its Opposition be filed under seal. (Opp’n [Doc. 169]; Mot. to File Docs Under Seal [Doc. 170].) The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to file its Opposition under seal [Doc. 170] and GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. [Doc. 168]. I. BACKGROUND Defendants are manufacturers and retailers2 of dietary supplements. (Third 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.