Anderson

Anderson v. Snap Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20223:22-cv-00256California1,999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICAH ANDERSON, Case No.: 22-cv-0256-GPC-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SNAP, INC.,

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

Defendant. PAUPERIS

15 (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

[Dkt. Nos. 1, 2] 19 On February 25, 2022, Plaintiff Micah Anderson, proceeding pro se, filed a form complaint against Defendant Snap, Inc. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff concurrently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 2.) Based on the reasons provided below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte DISMISSES the action for failure to state a claim. / / / / 27 I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis With the exception of an application for writ of habeas corpus, all parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.