Anderson
Anderson v. Snap Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICAH ANDERSON, Case No.: 22-cv-0256-GPC-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SNAP, INC.,
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
Defendant. PAUPERIS
15 (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
[Dkt. Nos. 1, 2] 19 On February 25, 2022, Plaintiff Micah Anderson, proceeding pro se, filed a form complaint against Defendant Snap, Inc. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff concurrently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 2.) Based on the reasons provided below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte DISMISSES the action for failure to state a claim. / / / / 27 I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis With the exception of an application for writ of habeas corpus, all parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the…